Pacheco v. Lachapelle
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtFrost, J.
This is a petition for dependency benefits under the workmen’s compensation act in accordance with the provisions of general laws 1956, §28-37-10. The case is here on the appeal of the respondent from a decree of the workmen’s compensation commission granting the petition. The attorney general, acting under the authority conferred upon him by the provisions of G. L. 1956, §28-37-11, has joined in this appeal and hereinafter the parties will be referred to generally as the respondent.
It appears from the agreed statement of facts that petitioner sustained a compensable injury to his back on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bradner v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- DE COSTA v. DevineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960
- Silva v. DevineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959
- Landry v. CORNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
3Cited by14 opinions
- Little v. Conflict of Interest CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Chambers v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Statewide Multiple Listing Service, Inc. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Markham v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.