Legal Opinion

Pacheco v. Lachapelle

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 26, 1960No. Eq. No. 2844PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrost, J.

This is a petition for dependency benefits under the workmen’s compensation act in accordance with the provisions of general laws 1956, §28-37-10. The case is here on the appeal of the respondent from a decree of the workmen’s compensation commission granting the petition. The attorney general, acting under the authority conferred upon him by the provisions of G. L. 1956, §28-37-11, has joined in this appeal and hereinafter the parties will be referred to generally as the respondent.

It appears from the agreed statement of facts that petitioner sustained a compensable injury to his back on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradner v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. DE COSTA v. DevineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960
  3. Silva v. DevineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959
  4. Landry v. CORNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Little v. Conflict of Interest CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. Chambers v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  3. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  4. Statewide Multiple Listing Service, Inc. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  5. Markham v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API