Legal Opinion
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 22, 2005No. CIV.A.03-2220-DJWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Miami Tribe of Oklahoma (“Miami Tribe”) has filed this action pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act, 1 seeking judicial review of the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Indian Affairs’ (“BIA”) decision denying James E. Smith’s application to gift a portion of his interest in restricted land. Smith seeks to convey one-third of his 3/88 undivided interest in a thirty-five acre allotment known as the Maria Christiana Miami Reserve No. 35 to Miami Tribe. The parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Miami Tribe of Ok v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010