Legal Opinion
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 8, 1998No. 97-2396-JWLPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
This action arises under the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721. Pursuant to its authority under IGRA, the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) denied approval of a class II gaming management contract submitted by plaintiff Miami Tribe of Oklahoma (the Tribe) on the ground that the proposed site for the gaming operation did not constitute “Indian lands,” as required under IGRA. The Tribe now seeks judicial review of that decision. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the court concludes on the record that is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- At & T Corporation v. Coeur D'Alene TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Citizens against Casino Gambling v. KempthorneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- CITIZENS AGAIST CAS. GAM., ERIE CTY. v. KempthorneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Kansas Ex Rel. Graves v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.