Legal Opinion

State v. Benson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 30, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 92-0864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

In this appeal, we hold that designation of a class 6 felony that has been left undes-ignated throughout the defendant’s probationary term may not occur in the absence of actual notice to the defendant. Accordingly, we vacate the felony designation entered by the trial court.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

At his arraignment, pursuant to a written agreement, Richard Lee Benson, Jr. (“defendant”), pled guilty to theft from a person, a class 6 “open-end,” or undesig-nated, offense. 1 The plea agreement specified that the “offense may be designated a felony at sentencing but…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. YoungbloodArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. MelendezArizona Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PintoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. State v. ShlionskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API