Harman v. Cabaniss
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel respondent as Judge of the Superior Court, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, to pass upon a motion to set aside an interlocutory decree of divorce, correct an alleged clerical error in the findings in the action and then render judgment on the findings so corrected.
In October, 1924, Claude H. Harman commenced an action for divorce against his wife, the petitioner herein. In paragraphs VI and VII of the complaint certain acts of extreme cruelty on the part of the defendant therein were alleged. The answer denied the alleged acts of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Harman v. HarmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by11 opinions
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Livesay v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Kohlstedt v. HauseurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Morgan v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.