Yorty v. Anderson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Petitioners, who are taxpayers and qualified voters residing in Los Angeles County, commenced this original proceeding in mandamus to compel respondents to convene as the members of the Reapportionment Commission and reapportion the state senatorial districts. Relying upon cases in other jurisdictions stemming from the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 [82 S.Ct. 691, 7 L.Ed.2d 663], they assert that section 6 of article IV of the California Constitution, insofar as it relates to apportionment of senatorial districts, invidiously discriminates…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- McFadden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Legislature v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Cooper v. Leslie Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Mauzy v. Legislative Redistricting BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Silver v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.