Legal Opinion
City of Long Beach v. Catalyst Waste-to-Energy Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. Greenfield, J.
Petitioner, City of Long Beach, moves by order to show cause seeking to stay the arbitration commenced by respondent pursuant to a demand for arbitration, upon the grounds that the claims respondent seeks to arbitrate are not subject to arbitration under the agreement between the parties. Respondent cross-moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 404 dismissing the petition upon the grounds that: (1) petitioner’s *120motion for a stay of arbitration is untimely under CPLR 7503 (c); and (2) that the claims raised by respondent in its demand for arbitration are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. StekardisNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re the Arbitration between Jonathan Logan, Inc. & Stillwater Worsted Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- In re the Arbitration between Jonathan Logan, Inc. & Stillwater Worsted Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Morgan v. Nikko Securities Co. International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Catalyst Waste-to-Energy Corp. & City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Pine Valley Productions v. S.L. CollectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993