Neary v. Happel (In Re Happel)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
JAMES E. SHAPIRO, Bankruptcy Judge.
The United States Trustee (“UST”) has objected to a discharge being granted to Stacie L. Happel (“debtor”) based upon § 727(a)(3) and § 727(a)(4)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code.
This adversary proceeding came on for trial on June 23, 2008. Following the testimony and receipt of exhibits, the court took this matter under advisement.
This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J). The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334.
FACTS
What was revealed in this trial has the makings of a novel. The difference, however, is that the events in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- In the Matter of Malen A. Juzwiak, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- In the Matter of Daniel J. Yonikus and Carolyn S. Yonikus, Debtors. Appeal of Daniel J. YonikusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Pereira v. Gardner (In Re Gardner)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Stathopoulos v. Bostrom (In Re Bostrom)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Layng v. Sgambati (In re Sgambati)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018