Legal Opinion

Neary v. Happel (In Re Happel)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 15, 2008No. 19-20768PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

JAMES E. SHAPIRO, Bankruptcy Judge.

The United States Trustee (“UST”) has objected to a discharge being granted to Stacie L. Happel (“debtor”) based upon § 727(a)(3) and § 727(a)(4)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code.

This adversary proceeding came on for trial on June 23, 2008. Following the testimony and receipt of exhibits, the court took this matter under advisement.

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J). The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334.

FACTS

What was revealed in this trial has the makings of a novel. The difference, however, is that the events in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. In the Matter of Malen A. Juzwiak, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. In the Matter of Daniel J. Yonikus and Carolyn S. Yonikus, Debtors. Appeal of Daniel J. YonikusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Pereira v. Gardner (In Re Gardner)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Stathopoulos v. Bostrom (In Re Bostrom)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Layng v. Sgambati (In re Sgambati)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API