Legal Opinion

Erie R. v. Dial

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1905No. 1,413PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court, made in the matter of the bankruptcy of the Victor Rubber Company, denying a claim for preference in the disposition of the bankrupt’s estate.

The claim as presented to the referee was founded upon the following facts: The Victor Rubber Company was engaged in the manufacture and sale of rubber tires at Snydersville, Ohio. Being in want of crude rubber, it bought certain quantities thereof in New York of Earle Bros., Thompson & Co., Lionel Hagenaers Company, and William Wright & Co., respectively, to be shipped by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. In re DuckerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  4. Holder v. Western German BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Board of Com'rs v. StrawnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Macy v. RoedenbeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  5. Smith v. Township of Au GresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API