Legal Opinion
Petition of Cricket Wireless
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 5, 2023No. 0416/22Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the Matter of the Petition of Cricket Wireless, LLC, and AT&T, Inc., No. 416, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Kenney, James A., III, J. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – STATUTES OF LIMITATION – LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO PARTICULAR ACTIONS – PENALTIES AND FORFEITURES – IN GENERAL One-year statute of limitation set forth in § 5-107 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings (“CJP”) Article of the Maryland Code did not apply in an administrative action brought by the Consumer Protection Division of the Office of the Attorney General (“the Division” or “CPD”) against Cricket Wireless, LLC (“Cricket”) and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ohio v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.