Legal Opinion
American President Lines, Ltd. v. King
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 1952Published
1Opinion of the Court
The finding of the Special Term, after trial, that the picket lines were not established as part of an organizational drive, but were retaliative in nature in a dispute with a rival union, was supported by sufficient competent evidence. Under the' circumstances presented, the picketing, even though peaceful and not misleading, was unlawful and was properly enjoined. (Cf. Dinny & Robbins, Inc., v. Davis, 290 N. Y. 101; Goodwins, Inc., v. Hagedorn, 303 N. Y. 300; Teamsters Union v. Hanke, 339 U. S. 470; Building Service Union v. Gazzam, 339 U. S. 532, and Pacific Nav. & Trading v. National…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262 v. GazzamSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. HankeSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Dinny & Robbins, Inc. v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.