Legal Opinion

Sieling v. Clark

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from judgment of the' Ninth District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action was to- recover $150 obtained by the defendant from the. plaintiff on three checks of the defendant for $50 each, which- the plaintiff cashed for him. The checks were drawn by the defendant, signed “ J. E. Clark, trustee,” to the order of “ J. E. Clark,” upon the Merchants’ Exchange National Bank, and were dated respectively May 18, 15 and 16, 1895, and indorsed by the defendant to the plaintiff..

*465The action, was in form for deceit, upon the ground that on the morning of May 13, 1895, when the plaintiff cashed the first check of $50, the defendant had not a dollar in the bank to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Espy v. Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Bull v. Bank of KassonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Brown v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Sindram v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conley v. BlinebryNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fruchtbaum v. SchinasiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
  3. Tompkins v. RodenbergerNew York Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API