Conley v. Blinebry
New York Supreme Court
Action for a tort.
1Opinion of the CourtFobbes, J.
Under the present practice, this action may be denominated an action in tort. If the proof is sufficient to warrant a recovery, the complaint is sufficient, in the averments thereisSp to afford relief in one of two forms: In fraud, or in conversion,
On the 4th day of May, 1897, the plaintiff sold and conveyed t© the defendant a house and a small farm containing about five acres of land, situate in this county. Thg purchase price was. fixed at $550. The consideration was paid at the time, except the sum of $250, which was then and there secured by a bondj, and a mortgage as security, covering…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Van Pelt v. . McGrawNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Butler v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co. v. KneelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Swan v. Saddlemire & WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1832
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.