Legal Opinion

Conley v. Blinebry

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1899Published

Action for a tort.

1Opinion of the CourtFobbes, J.

Under the present practice, this action may be denominated an action in tort. If the proof is sufficient to warrant a recovery, the complaint is sufficient, in the averments thereisSp to afford relief in one of two forms: In fraud, or in conversion,

On the 4th day of May, 1897, the plaintiff sold and conveyed t© the defendant a house and a small farm containing about five acres of land, situate in this county. Thg purchase price was. fixed at $550. The consideration was paid at the time, except the sum of $250, which was then and there secured by a bondj, and a mortgage as security, covering…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Van Pelt v. . McGrawNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Butler v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co. v. KneelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Swan v. Saddlemire & WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1832

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API