Dew v. Garner
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The statement of the ease will contain a sufficient outline for a proper understanding of the question here presented.
Appellant, Dew, defended this hill for sale for division upon the theory that he was not a tenant in common with the other parties to the cause, but owned the land in severalty, and had acquired a perfect title thereto by adverse possession under color of title. The mortgage from Celeste Childress, one of the heirs of Pollard Childress, and Robert Cox executed in 1901 to this appellant, purported to convey the entire interest and fee-simple title in and to the land. They were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Murphree v. HansonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Joyce v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Riggs v. FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Fielder v. ChildsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Miller v. Vizzard Investment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Trust Under Will of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Thompson v. OdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Moore v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Hardin v. CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Long v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.