Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Miller

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1939No. 2103PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ilsley, District Judge.

This is a direct appeal from a judgment in the sum of $801.01, entered after a verdict of the jury was returned in favor of plaintiff and respondent against the defendant and appellant, Sam Miller.

There are some twenty-three specifications of error set forth herein, but counsel for the appellant state, “It has been concluded to present only those specifications which go to the sufficiency of plaintiff’s pleading and proof.” Counsel waive all other alleged errors. We agree with counsel that this may be done.

Other matters at issue between plaintiff and other defendants…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoge v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Kahn v. Traders InsuranceWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Smith v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Williams v. YocumWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Chesney v. Valley Live Stock Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. True v. Hi-Plains Elevator MacHinery, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. P & M CATTLE CO. v. HollerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Schaffer v. Standard Timber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Hiatt v. La FeverWyoming Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API