Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge James B. Park. Baldwin superior court. September 16, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

1. The overruling of a demurrer to a plea, and of objections to an amendment to a plea, can only be taken advantage of by timely exception; such rulings are not proper ground for new trial. Hawkins v. Studdard, 132 Ga. 265 (63 S. E. 852, 131 Am. St. R. 190); Bullock v. Cordele Sash etc. Co., 114 Ga. 627 (40 S. E. 734).

2. Upon interlocutory orders and rulings, not excepted to pendente lite, error can not be assigned in a bill of exceptions to the overruling of a motion for new trial, certified more than thirty days after the adjournment of the court at which such interlocutory orders were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Bullock & Co. v. Cordele Sash, Door & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. City Council of Waycross v. YoumansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Luke v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Wilkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API