Davison Chemical Co. v. Baugh Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Dawkins, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. Following is defendant’s third prayer, which the Court directed to be set out in the report of this case: Deft/s 3rd Prayer.—The jury are instructed that although the defendant made contracts with other parties than its regular customers, calling, for future delivery of acid under such contracts in an amount which, when added to- the delivcries required during…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Dawkins, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. Following is defendant’s third prayer, which the Court directed to be set out in the report of this case: Deft/s 3rd Prayer.—The jury are instructed that although the defendant made contracts with other parties than its regular customers, calling, for future delivery of acid under such contracts in an amount which, when added to- the delivcries required during the same periods by its existing contracts^ exceeded the amount which its plant as existing when such additional contracts…
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment obtained by the appellee against the appellant. On the , 28th of April, 1913, a contract was entered into between the parties by which the appellee purchased from the appellant from 30,000 to 50,000 tons of clear sulphuric acid per year, delivered at the appellee’s works at Canton, Md., or to Baugh & Sons Co., Norfolk, Va., from a period beginning January 1, 1913, and ending December 31, 1917. There was to be a minimum of 30,000 tons, or a maximum of 50,000 tons of 2,000 pounds each per annum, on a basis of 50° Beaume, 60° Fahrenheit, and the appellee agreed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Garfield & Proctor Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Davison Chemical Co. v. Baugh Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
- Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. PiperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1902
- McKeefrey v. Connellsville Coke & Iron Co. ex rel. H. C. Frick Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1893
- Metropolitan Coal Co. v. BillingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barnes v. Housing Authority of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- North American Specialty Insurance v. Boston Medical GroupCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Engle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Regester v. McCartBaltimore City Circuit Court · 1890