Legal Opinion

Regester v. McCart

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Decided January 22, 1890Published

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This case comes before the Court on exceptions to the answer of the defendants. The plaintiffs filed their original bill, and the defendants filed their separate answers thereto. The plaintiff then obtained permission to amend their bill, and the amended bill was filed; to this amended bill the defendants ' also filed separate answers. After these last answers were filed the plaintiffs filed exceptions to the answers of the defendants without designating to which of the several answers —whether those to the amended or to the original bill — they were intended to apply. On an examination of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davison Chemical Co. v. Baugh Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API