Legal Opinion

Worley v. Murley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 28, 1808PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Bibb.

— Worley had judgment by default, and damages assessed to £. 12 *2647 s. upon a covenant to pay £. 10 5s. in good trade, oil or before the 15th of October ensuing the date of the obligation. The defendant, Murlev, moved, in arrest of judgment, that the declaration had charged no special demand, at che usual place of residence of the defendant, and had averred no reason for Rot making a special demand. The judgment was arrested, the plaintiff obtained leave and amended bis declaration, averring that the defendant had no usual place of residence at the date of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  2. Beaubien v. BrinckerhoffIllinois Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Winn v. FreeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API