Beaubien v. Brinckerhoff
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, Justice
This was an action of assumpsit commenced by Brinckerhoff, as an endorsee of a promissory note, against Beaubien, the maker. The declaration is in the usual form, stating the note to be made, “ to wit,” at Chicago, in the county of Cook, but contains no averment that the plaintiff and defendant, or that the defendant resided, at the time of commencing the suit, in the city of Chicago, or in the county of Cook.
The summons was directed to the high constable of the city, and by him returned, served on the defendant, judgment was given in favor of the plaintiff, by default.
The assignment of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Capron v. Van NoordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
- Smith v. McIverSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Den v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Commonwealth v. M'CloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
- Buckminster v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walkinshaw v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- In Re Estate of MearsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Werner v. W. H. Shons Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929
- Cordis v. BradyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982