Jackson v. Ashton
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall
The title or caption of the bill, is no part of the bill, and does not remove the objection to the defects in the pleadings. The bill and proceedings should state the citizenship of the parties, to give the court jurisdiction of the case.
The only difficulty which could arise to the dismissal of the bill, presents itself upon the statement, “ that the defendant is of Philadelphia.” This, it might be answered, shews that he is a citizen of Pennsylvania.
If this were a new question, the court might decide otherwise ; but the decision of the court, in cases which have heretofore been before it,…
2Cited by74 opinions
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.