Baker v. Weaver

I concur with the court’s Opinion, but would supplement it. Baker’s Complaint included a claim for monies paid by him to the third party repairmen. It is manifestly implicit in such inclusion that a question existed as to whether Baker was liable for the work of the third party repairmen for whose work he claimed the right to collect.

The trial judge in refusing the request for charge made the following comments:

“Mr. Nettles, [Weaver’s counsel] you have a valid point in that regard; however, I believe the totality of the charge does cover it.”

The trial judge apparently agreed with the…