Legal Opinion

Mercantile Protective Bureau v. Specht

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBikdz-ekd, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff as holder of the following trade acceptance:

“Trade Acceptance
“$285.00 April 27, 1927.
“Sixty days after date pay to tbe order of Farmers & Ranchers-, Stock Salt Oo., Inc. Omaha, Nebr. Two Hundred and Eighty-five Dollars. 'The obligation of the acceptor hereof arises out of the pms chase of goods from the drawer.
“To Wellsburg Supply Store, Wellsburg, No. Dak.
“Farmers & Ranchers Stock Salt Oo., Inc.
“By E. M. Bechtelheimer Pres. & Treas.”

The above instrument bore upon its face an acceptance as follows:

“Accepted April 27, 1927. Bank Farmers State Bank.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Jennings v. ToddSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles City v. GleichmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Miller v. OttawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Bank of Marianna v. Havana Canning Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. First National Bank v. Power Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API