Legal Opinion
Mercantile Protective Bureau v. Specht
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBikdz-ekd, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff as holder of the following trade acceptance:
“Trade Acceptance
“$285.00 April 27, 1927.
“Sixty days after date pay to tbe order of Farmers & Ranchers-, Stock Salt Oo., Inc. Omaha, Nebr. Two Hundred and Eighty-five Dollars. 'The obligation of the acceptor hereof arises out of the pms chase of goods from the drawer.
“To Wellsburg Supply Store, Wellsburg, No. Dak.
“Farmers & Ranchers Stock Salt Oo., Inc.
“By E. M. Bechtelheimer Pres. & Treas.”
The above instrument bore upon its face an acceptance as follows:
“Accepted April 27, 1927. Bank Farmers State Bank.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Jennings v. ToddSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles City v. GleichmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Miller v. OttawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First Bank of Marianna v. Havana Canning Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
- First National Bank v. Power Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930