Legal Opinion
Board of Medical Examiners v. Duhon
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1994No. 92CA1009PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CRISWELL.
The respondent, S. Crawford Duhon (doctor), seeks our review of an order entered by the district court enforcing an administrative subpoena duces tecum issued by the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners (board), pursuant to § 12-36-104(l)(b), C.R.S. (1991 Repl.Vol. 5B), which required the doctor to produce “complete office records for all patients” in which a particular device was used by the doctor as a diagnostic tool between January 1, 1991, through November 13, 1991. We reverse the order and remand for a new hearing.
The board filed a petition pursuant to §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Charnes v. DiGiacomoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Petition of EdilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Hurley v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1986
- Gher v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR COUNTY OF ADAMSSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of Medical Examiners v. DuhonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. MasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- McNiel v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- Colorado State Board of Accountancy v. Arthur Andersen LLPColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re the Marriage of RiveraColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.