Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Lincoln Realty Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1946PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The question for decision may be stated as follows: Where one not liable on the mortgage indebtedness acquires the legal title to mortgaged premises during the pendency of a suit to foreclose and thereafter redeems from the foreclosure sale, may the holder of a judgment for an unsatisfied balance of the mortgage indebtedness cause the property so redeemed to be sold again on execution for the satisfaction of such balance?

The answer depends upon the proper interpretation and application of certain provisions of our statute relating to mortgage foreclosures, redemption and execution.

Prior to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flanders v. AumackOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Williams v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kaston v. StoreyOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Higgs v. McDuffieOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Dray v. DrayOregon Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. DuntleyOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Lilly v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Oregon Ex Rel. Director of the Department of Veterans' Affairs v. Hurt (In Re Hurt)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Call v. JeremiahOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State Ex Rel. Dunker v. Spink Hutterian BrethrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API