Legal Opinion
Sussman v. Gustav
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 1920No. 15521PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered March 19, 1919, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
Suit by appellant to recover damages of respondent for breach of a contract to deliver scrap iron. The appellant has his place of business in *460Tacoma, and the respondent does business in the city of Seattle. Each was engaged in the scrap iron business. On November 8, 1916, the respondent gave a written option to the appellant as follows:
“Nov. 8, 1916.
“We, the undersigned, hereby grant an option to Mr. Joe Sussman of the Tacoma Junk Co. on 100 tons of scrap wrought iron at $11.50 per net ton, f. o. b. cars, Seattle, said option holds good for two days from date. (Signed) Pacific Junk Co.,
“Per…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- R. J. Menz Lumber Co. v. E. J. McNeeley & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Ranahan v. GibbonsWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Badger State Lumber Co. v. G. W. Jones Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Caldwell Bros. & Co. v. Coast Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Engeldinger v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yours Truly Biscuit Co. v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
- Sussman v. GustavWashington Supreme Court · 1921