Legal Opinion

Comstock v. Mitchell

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1990No. 18844Published

1Opinion of the Court

793 P.2d 261 (1990)

110 N.M. 131

Frederick G. COMSTOCK Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Josephine MITCHELL Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18844.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

June 4, 1990.

John B. Speer, Albuquerque, for plaintiff-appellant.

Singer, Smith & Williams, Gordon Reiselt, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellee.

OPINION

SOSA, Chief Justice.

Mitchell hired Yudin to represent her in her divorce action. In the course of the proceedings Mitchell and Yudin agreed to hire Comstock, an accountant, to testify as an expert on Mitchell's behalf. Through Yudin Mitchell paid Comstock $2,500 for so testifying. Comstock billed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Chevron Oil Co. v. Sutton Ex Rel. SuttonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Vickers v. North American Land Developments, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Echols v. NC Ribble CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API