Legal Opinion

Wells v. Newton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 13, 1868PublishedCited by 8 opinions

CASE 36 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM OHIO CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 5 /. J. M., 353 ; Luke vs. Marshall, fyc. 11 B. Mon., 32; Lochland's heirs vs. Downing's ex'rs.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion oe tiie court:

The parties in this case submitted to the circuit court a precautionary petition for a judicial interpretation of the will of James Newton. The court construed so much of the will as concerns two grandchildren of the testator so as to entitle each of them representatively to only half of a child’s part, and they appeal.

So much of the will as essentially applies to the question submitted for-our revision provides, that, after a small legacy to the testator’s surviving wife, the residue of his estate, movable and immovable, including the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rogers v. BurressCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Stephens v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Lidgate v. DanfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Armstrong v. Crutchfield's Exors.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Day's Administrator v. BrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API