Alcar Group, Inc. v. Corporate Performance Systems, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
Can a United States corporation maintain a Lanham Act action against a foreign corporation for alleged trademark violations that occurred entirely abroad on no more showing than that these hurt the plaintiffs ability to conduct its business and license its products worldwide? I conclude that, without an account of how to set limits on the exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction, this would extend my jurisdiction beyond the limits that the law allows. Accordingly I grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss any claims alleging Lanham Act…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- William Sapperstein v. Robert Hager and Patricia Hager Doing Business as B & G CycleryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Monster Energy Co. v. WenshengDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- IPOX Schuster, LLC v. Nikko Asset Management Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- X-It Products, LLC v. Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
- Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. Central Illinois Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Wafra Leasing Corp. 1999-A-1 v. Prime Capital Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.