Legal Opinion

Alcar Group, Inc. v. Corporate Performance Systems, Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 16, 2000No. 00 C 2186PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

Can a United States corporation maintain a Lanham Act action against a foreign corporation for alleged trademark violations that occurred entirely abroad on no more showing than that these hurt the plaintiffs ability to conduct its business and license its products worldwide? I conclude that, without an account of how to set limits on the exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction, this would extend my jurisdiction beyond the limits that the law allows. Accordingly I grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss any claims alleging Lanham Act…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. William Sapperstein v. Robert Hager and Patricia Hager Doing Business as B & G CycleryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Monster Energy Co. v. WenshengDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  2. IPOX Schuster, LLC v. Nikko Asset Management Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. X-It Products, LLC v. Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  4. Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. Central Illinois Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  5. Wafra Leasing Corp. 1999-A-1 v. Prime Capital Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API