Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Ruud

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1977No. 2849Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWood, Chief Judge

Upon stopping the vehicle, the officer checked defendant’s driver’s license and sought to check the registration papers for the vehicle. This is undisputed. However, it is also undisputed that the reason for stopping the car was not for a good faith driver’s license or a registration check. Rather, the stop was on the basis of the officer’s “hunch” that the car was stolen. The officer arrived at this “hunch” after observing a young female driving a fairly new pickup with a camper shell and with an out-of-state license plate. These three facts do not provide a basis for an investigatory stop.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BloomNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. GalvanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State v. BidegainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. United States v. Gary LepinskiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Potts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API