United States v. Gary Lepinski
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal follows convictions of transportation in interstate commerce of a firearm by one previously convicted of a felony, 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(a), and under the Dyer Act, 18 U. S.C. § 2312. Appellant Lepinski raises three issues, arguing (1) that the arrest of appellant and his companion was without probable cause and unlawful, requiring exclusion of proof obtained as the result of an unlawful arrest; (2) that there was a working arrangement between Federal and State officers so that Rule 5(a), F.R.Crim.P., applied to the State officer, and that in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Miguel Angel RecaldeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Billy G. ByersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Augustin Alonso LopezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. SmaldoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. John Lee BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.