Legal Opinion

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 4, 1988No. 570-84CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBINSON, Judge.

This action is before the Court on Cross-motions for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Rules of the United States Claims Court by the plaintiffs and defendant. The plaintiffs are a contractor and its surety. Jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court by 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) and 41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(1). The claim is founded upon an express contract between the plaintiff FEDCON and the United States. The defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and the plaintiffs’ Cross-motion for Summary Judg*352ment is denied for the reasons which follow.

Factual…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Edwards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  2. Avedon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Career & Technical Assn. v. Auburn Vocational School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Erwin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API