Legal Opinion

In Re Subpoena No. 22.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1998PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this appeal we are asked to decide whether the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas properly denied appellant’s, A.B.’s, motion to quash Subpoena No. 22. Specifically, we must determine whether the privilege accorded psychotherapist-client communications bars the disclosure of previous communications between a client and his psychotherapist to a special grand juiy investigating the client’s murder. We hold that, under the unique circumstances of this case, the psychotherapist-client privilege becomes a qualified privilege after the murder of the client and that privileged…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Thatcher's Drug Store of West Goshen, Inc. v. Consolidated Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In re Thirty-third Statewide Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Slusaw v. HoffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Joyner v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API