Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 1999PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

William and Jean Joyner appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) which denied post-trial motions for a new trial or a judgment notwithstanding the verdict after a jury returned a verdict in favor of Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA). We affirm.

SEPTA’s employees were performing work on its utility poles on the north side of Girard Avenue. ■ Prior to beginning the work, SEPTA’s foreman inspected the poles on the north side of the Avenue and found no problems. Nevertheless, one of the poles on the north side…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Estate of KofskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. MaguiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bacó ex rel. Castillo de Jesús v. Almacén Ramón Rosa Delgado Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2000
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Joe v. Prison Health Services, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Bagwell v. Pennsylvania Department of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Law Office of Douglas T. Harris v. Philadelphia Waterfront Partners, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API