Legal Opinion

McInerney v. Wm. F. McDonald Const. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 22, 1940No. 185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

There are before the court cross-motions as follows:

That of September 18, 1940, by the defendant, seeking:(1) To restrict the plaintiff to dates not earlier than June 21, 1924, for conception, disclosure and reduction to practise of the invention of the patent in suit, according to plaintiff’s answers to defendant’s interrogatories I to IV, inclusive, filed on October 24, 1939.(2) To require the plaintiff to specify under oath the date or dates within the summer of 1924 which will be relied on for conception, disclosure and reduction to practise.

On the argument of that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Young v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Grace & Co. (Pacific Coast), a Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API