Legal Opinion
In re H.D.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 7, 2018No. DOCKET NOS. A-5321-16T1; A-5322-16T1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESSANO, P.J.A.D.
*208We consolidate these two appeals that were argued back-to-back to issue a single opinion because they involve only one common legal issue.
Appellants J.M. and H.D. were convicted of sex offenses, see N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(b), in 1994 and 1998 respectively, and sentenced to periods of probation. Pursuant to the provisions of Megan's Law, N.J.S.A. 2C:7-1 to 11, both were sentenced to community supervision for life (CSL) as required by N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6.4(a), the *209Violent Predator Incapacitation Act (VPIA), "enacted as a 'component' of Megan's Law at the time of its passage in 1994." In…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- State v. GandhiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Wilson v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of Registrant H.D. In the Matter of Registrant J.M. (082254)(Essex County, Salem County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. R.I. (92-04-0543, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019