Legal Opinion

James v. James

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1904No. 4856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered June 4, 1903, in favor of the plaintiff, upon overruling a 'demurrer to the complaint, in an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, C. J.

The respondent, as plaintiff in the court below, brought this action against Rathan O’Dell, Emma O’Dell, Margaret A. James, Le Roy James, Bertha James, Mabel E. James, and Walter W. James, as defendants, to quiet title in himself to certain real property situated in the county of Spokane. Le Roy James appeals from a judgment quieting title against his interests.

The respondent moves to dismiss this appeal, assigning as reasons therefor that the notice given is insufficient to effect an appeal, and that the opening brief contains no assignment of errors. That part of the notice to which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ahern v. AhernWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ranahan v. GibbonsWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Brown v. CallowayWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. In re the Estate of MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Teynor v. HeibleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Cunningham v. KrutzWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hall v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Carlson v. MacCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. v. RomanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API