Legal Opinion

Leitchfield Milling Company v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 9, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Willis

Affirming.

The ultimate question to be decided is whether certain property claimed by Ethel Gr. Rogers should be subjected to the debts of her husband. The Leitchfield Milling Company instituted the action upon a promissory note for $1,400 executed by Clarence Rogers and due in one year after date. At the institution of the suit a general order of attachment was obtained and levied upon the property in question, consisting of a butcher shop with its equipment, furniture, and fixtures. Ethel Gf. Rogers was made a party defendant to the suit, and the petition…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cogar v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Forman v. GaultCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Louisville & N. R. R. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. Elkhorn Coal Corporation v. HiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Winfrey's Trustee v. WinfreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmers' Bank of Fountain Run v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Wyan v. Raisin Monumental CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Hays v. CyrusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. House v. Farmers State BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. Taylor v. Rapp Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API