Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Edmondson
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 16, 2006No. 04-CV-848-TCK-SAJPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER 1
KERN, District Judge.
Before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant the State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Drew Edmondson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and Brad Henry, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Oklahoma (the “State Defendants”) (Docket No. 7); the Motion to Dismiss of the United States of America, ex rel. John Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America and George W. Bush, in his official capacity as President of the United States (the “Federal…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. DedmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Bishop v. United States ex rel. HolderDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2014
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 95 OAG 003, Maryland Attorney General Reports2010
- United States v. DedmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.