Legal Opinion
The People v. Dru Allard
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 2016No. 129PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Garcia, J.
Defendant Dru Allard moved to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 on the ground that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial. Among other things, defendant alleged that the People should be charged with the 97-day period between Supreme Court’s dismissal of all felony counts in the indictment, and the People’s service of a new indictment. Defendant argued that “[t]he absence of a valid indictment during this period . . . directly impaired the People’s ability to proceed to trial and as such must be charged.” Defendant’s moving papers…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. GrudenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. BeasleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. GoodeNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. EdmeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. RicartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. MinwalkuletAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.