Legal Opinion

State v. Maggiore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 29, 1918No. 22999Published

Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu; Jerry Cline, Judge. Felix Maggiore and others were convicted of keeping a blind tiger, and they except and appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, C. J.

Defendant, having been convicted upon a charge of keeping a blind tiger, presents his case to this court upon a bill of exceptions reserved to the refusal of the trial court to order the prosecution to file a bill of particulars setting forth whether he was to be prosecuted as owner, partner, or agent, the kind of liquor he was charged *465with handling, and whether it was for sale, barter, exchange, or giving away.

The bill of information reads, in part, as follows:

“That Felix Maggiore and Bob Delovisio, • * * on the 1st day of June, 1917, and upon each and every day thereafter up to and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BarnetteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  3. State v. FerrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. State v. GarlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. State v. NejinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API