Legal Opinion

State v. Nejin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 16, 1916No. 22093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from City Court of Shreveport; L. O. Blanchard, Judge. F. A. Nejin was convicted of operating a blind tiger, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

The defendant was convicted of operating a blind tiger, in violation of Act No. 8 of 1915, was sentenced to pay a fine and be imprisoned, and has appealed.

The affidavit charges that:

The defendant “did unlawfully operate a blind tiger at No. 1116 Marshall street; Shreveport, Caddo parish, La., in which parish and city the sale of intoxicating liquors is prohibited, by then and there keeping intoxicating liquors for sale, barter, exchange, or habitual giving away at the above-described place.”

Before pleading to the charge, the defendant demanded a bill of particulars, and particularly demanded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BarnetteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. State v. FairgrieveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Shreveport v. BrysonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  2. State v. GardnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. State v. MaggioreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API