Legal Opinion

People v. Kagan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Cooke.

A bank officer or employee who, without more, extends to an individual credit in amounts exceeding civil limits is not guilty of feloniously misapplying bank funds. “Wilful misapplication”, as that term is used in section 673 of the Banking Law, requires that the offender have a personal pecuniary interest in the transactions before criminal liability will attach.

Subdivision 1 of section 103 of the Banking Law generally prohibits a bank from lending to any single customer “an amount which will exceed ten percentum of the [bank’s] capital stock, surplus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. MarcusNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. People v. KreselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. People v. KaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CalandraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Nardeo v. Diaz, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Bronx County2024
  3. People v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API