Legal Opinion

Franke v. Janes

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 22, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00119Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION RYAN FRANKE Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:23-cv-119-RGJ-RSE KENNY JANES Defendant * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff Ryan Franke (“Franke”) claims that Defendant Kenny Janes (“Janes”), an officer with the Hillview Police Department, used excessive force while detaining him. [DE 1 at 1]. Janes moves for summary judgment. [DE 26]. Franke responded [DE 32] and Janes replied [DE 34]. For the following reasons, Janes’s motion [DE 26] is GRANTED. Because summary judgment is granted and this matter will be…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API