Meeker v. Gilbert
Washington Territory
Appeal from tbe District Court bolding terms at Vancouver. Second District. The material facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court · JonesChief Justice Jones
In the brief of appellee (the plaintiff below) he states his complaint as follows:
That on and prior to January 17, 1873, James Oarty, Sr., was the owner in fee of the donation land claim No. 37, and that about said date he conveyed to James Oarty, Jr., a portion thereof, described as follows:
“Being parts of sections 18 and 19, in township 4 N., B. 1 E., and section 24, in township 4 N., B. 1 W., and being the south half of the donation claim of James Oarty, Sr., Not. No. 195, which said half of said donation claim is more particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning in section 24,…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Jones.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stout v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Boorman v. SunnuchsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by7 opinions
- Washington Iron Works Co. v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Aid v. BowermanWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Miller v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Womach v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Dale v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.