Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Whitehead

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 3, 1979No. 79-117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In Whitehead v. Rowland, 352 So.2d 128 (Fla.2d DCA 1977), this court reversed a judgment which had rescinded a deed to ten acres of citrus grove. The ground for reversal was that the court had violated the parol evidence rule by admitting testimony of the plaintiff that the consideration flowing to her for the conveyance of the property was the oral promise by one of the grantees to cultivate the grove and to divide the profits with her. The last paragraph of our opinion read as follows:

In the instant case, it is evident that the parties fully stated in writing the amount of the consideration…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tyus v. Apalachicola Northern Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. Beverly Beach Properties v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Shetter v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Webb Fur. Co. Inc. v. EverettSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Apalachicola Northern Railroad Company v. TyusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Providence Square Ass'n v. BiancardiSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. MARLYN TRACEY v. WELLS FARGO BANK N. A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Cirou v. Naples Awning & Glass, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API