Brede v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal reported in 143 Minn. 374, 173 N. W. 805, further testimony was taken before Hale, J., who made findings and ordered judgment as, set out in the second paragraph of the opinion. From that portion of the judgment mentioned, plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
This is the second appearance of this case, On the first appeal an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was reversed with directions to the district court to take further testimony on certain features of the case. Brede v. Minn. Crushed Stone Co. 143 Minn. 374, 173 N. W. 805. Further testimony was taken and additional findings were made and judgment was entered thereon in plaintiffs’ favor after their motion for further and amended findings had been denied. They have appealed from portions of the judgment hereafter referred to.
*4081. The judgment enjoins the defendant from…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brede v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Salo v. Duluth & Iron Range RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Lynch v. ShielySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Hindman v. Texas Lime CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- State ex rel. Beery v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Reed v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Meyers v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.