Legal Opinion

Cox v. Commissioners of Highways

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Writ op Error to the Circuit Court of Clinton county; the Hon. Samuel L. Dwight, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

The commissioners of highways of East Fork township complained to a justice of the peace of that town that W. H. Cox, plaintiff in error, was obstructing a certain highway in the town. On a trial of the case plaintiff in error was fined one cent and costs. On appeal by him to the circuit court of Clinton county a trial was had before the court without a jury, aud judgment was given against him for three dollars and costs. He now brings the record before this court on a writ of error.

The question in controversy is, was the place obstructed by plaintiff in error in a public highway or not. He…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Town of Lewiston v. ProctorIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Shields v. RossIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hankins v. CallowayIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Oetting v. PollockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Highway Commissioners v. KinahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Goerke v. Town of ManitouColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. People ex rel. Snow v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API