Legal Opinion
Calantas v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1980No. 3663PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
BURKE, Justice.
In Calantas v. State, 599 P.2d 147 (Alaska 1979), we affirmed appellant’s conviction on two counts of assault with intent to kill. He now petitions for rehearing, contending, among other things, that he was entitled to a reversal of those convictions under the United States Supreme Court’s recent holding in Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979). 1
In Sandstrom, the defendant was accused of “deliberate homicide,” in an information charging that he “purposely or knowingly cause the death of Annie Jessen.” Id. at 512, 99 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. SandstromMontana Supreme Court · 1978
- Calantas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hintz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Walker v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving TriemAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Gargan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.