Legal Opinion

May v. Hillman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1939No. 4 Div. 67PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill sought an accounting on a mortgage, and for a sale of the lands and discharge -of the mortgage debt.

It is averred that on January 15, 1929, J. E. Walden borrowed of F. M. Gaines the sum of $7,250, and secured the same by the lands described in the mortgage; that on February 1, 1929, H. L. Hillman, the husband of complainant, purchased the notes and mortgage in question, which by exhibit is made a part of the bill; and he (H. L. Hillman) “became entitled to the money due by the said J. ' E. Walden * * * to said F. M. Gaines;” that default has occurred under the terms…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Biggers v. IngersollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Moore v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Floyd v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Finney v. StorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Clark v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API